G+_Joel G. J Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ Bryan Burnett #Feedback : Would you consider the prospect of making replacement props via 3d printing? What would be your argument against it? After stating your argument, Check this out: http://makezine.com/2014/07/16/make-a-working-quadcopter-propeller-with-a-3d-printing-pen/ http://makezine.com/2014/07/16/make-a-working-quadcopter-propeller-with-a-3d-printing-pen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 The main argument against it would be: 1. Balancing might become REALLY difficult 2. Death and destruction at high RPM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Mark Messiha Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ so if engineering is the problem I wonder if you could (somehow) find a 3d file for a larger prop developed by a aeronautics company or something and then scale it down (let the record show that I am a out of work 3d modeler that has little knowledge of engineering.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Joel G. J Posted November 3, 2014 Author Share Posted November 3, 2014 Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ : Maybe mention this in the next show for all those who were thinking about it during last week's props segment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_610GARAGE Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Mark Messiha Its not really an engineering problem, its an execution problem. Under high speeds, the props are under great stress, if there is one defect in the prop, it can shatter. Unfortunately, 3d printers don't make injection molded quality parts. If an air bubble forms, it can create a weak spot, and the blade shatters. Also 3d printers aren't all that accurate. A good mold will be milled with very high precision in a cnc mill (probably around .0001" or greater accuracy). The inaccuracy of a 3d printer can cause the prop to be out of balance. If the prop is even slightly out of balance, it can lead to high vibrations (which can destroy the quad). These high vibrations can also cause the prop to shatter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Bryan Burnett Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 Yeah I second 610bob , I like the idea of 3d printing props, but structural rigidity would be my concern. Now maybe 3d printing a frame that saves weight would be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Eddie Foy Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 balancing!!!! That and the layer to layer adhesion isn't that great. Nope. Wouldn't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts