Jump to content

FAA is starting to require registration of all drones that weigh over half a pound!


G+_Joshua Hamlett
 Share

Recommended Posts

* Craft < 250g (Syma X5C, etc.) do not require registration.

* Craft for commercial use still need to wait for a new process.

 

I think it's overreaching into Sec. 336's territory where Congress said not to do this sort of thing. The FAA's position is something like this:

 

We're not allowed to make new rules for model aircraft, but it's already an aircraft and all aircraft need to be registered. We're clarifying the registration process for your model aircraft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wayne Hobbins I sincerely doubt it rated on the President's radar. I'm sure something equivalent happened within the FAA's hierarchy.

 

Air safety is a real concern, especially with the really stupid things that have been done. There was a recent report of 300+ drone sightings from within aircraft and while there was no evasive action required (Trying to find my source..), it's just a matter of time before there's a true near-miss.

 

By the time a real problem happens, it's too late to do anything useful about it.

 

That said, the registration is only useful if the craft is recovered and number is legible.

 

It's funny that the recommendations from the workgroup suggested $0.001 registration fee, should one be required. The FAA turned that into $5.

 

Irresponsible operators ruin things for the rest of us. Here's another example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While this wasn't the original story, here's FAA's raw source data on the subject. https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=83544. There's a link to an Excel doc, take precautions...

 

Many of the sightings are from Cessna (140mph cruise speed) or other small craft including helicopters.

 

I don't think either of us have the necessary experience of a pilot to tell what's within the realm of reasonably visible. I can only imagine that when it's your job to be aware of the airspace around you, anything flying at your altitude is worth your attention, especially a white and red blob that's clearly not a bird.

 

I'll grant that a number of the reported sightings are near model aircraft airports and should be excluded. I haven't read this article yet but it may provide useful counterpoints: http://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/ama-s-response-to-the-faa-s-drone-sighting-report

 

I'm all for healthy skepticism but not conspiracy theories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ticket, unlikely. In an extreme case, reported to the FAA.

 

Know your rights (including the legal gray areas) and you can likely talk yourself out of most interactions with police.

 

My favorite example of this involves a moped, an e-bike, and some extremely close drafting.

 

Ben Reese, pumpkins aren't aircraft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've made the same argument, but it's really irrelevant. Congress authorizes the FAA, through law, to make regulations and enforce them.

 

The FMRA Section 336 defines a model aircraft and limits FAA's power to regulate them.

 

As I've mentioned, the FAA is interpreting that law to mean they can enforce registration since the law considers model aircraft as aircraft and registration requirements already exist. They're just establishing a separate process.

 

I think it's an overreach and perhaps someone will make a case that this considers "promulgating" a new regulation against them. This is specifically what's forbidden and would make the process void.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...