G+_Robert Carlos Posted July 10, 2013 Share Posted July 10, 2013 And then there were two. who will Hulu go to? http://www.multichannel.com/distribution/report-guggenheim-out-hulu-bidding/144333 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Karla Posted July 10, 2013 Share Posted July 10, 2013 I really hope its not DirecTV...they'll turn it into some subscription based clusterfuc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Michael Interbartolo Posted July 10, 2013 Share Posted July 10, 2013 cause AT&T would be a better fit and not hit you with all sorts of fees. I have not complaints with Directv for my service and until Hulu stops running ads for a subscription I have no need for them. Hulu needs to decide, ads or pay not both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_RJ Lewis Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 I don't mind paying and having ads... anyone w a cable sub does that quite regularly and for much more money. I do hope that Hulu is able to have a definable value for the money though. The proposition is really not there at this time. For $8 /mo you get: old episodes of some shows with no listing of which shows and new episodes of some shows. There's a listing (the entire catalogue), but not all shows have the same window of availability and some shows are only available on the web versus everywhere that you can use hulu plus. I don't really hold out hope there though. Being owned by NBC, Fox and Disney didn't mean that they could work that out. Directv and ATT aren't exactly the heavy in this market, so I see either as probably meaning changes tantamount to a step backwards for the consumer. Although if Hulu's design and backend are applied to DirecTV's currently buggy application, I'd consider it a partial win. As a $200+ /mo ATT subscriber, I have no hope for anything progressive, or good if they are bought by ATT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts