Jump to content

Apparently, this was recorded during a commercial break of "The Tech Guy " this last Sunday


G+_Mark Swaim
 Share

Recommended Posts

Apparently, this was recorded during a commercial break of "The Tech Guy" this last Sunday. This was the response I expected during TWIT(without fowl language). This recording was edited in a pro No Agenda stance and obviously Leo was angry when responding to the chat room bombarding him with why John this or that.

 

The whole conflict between Leo and John I wish wasn't going on. But Leo is right in that it is a private matter. I don't expect a show where they publicly hug each other and forgive and forget. Also feel it's a waste of energy to confront Leo to forgive John. Their both adults and know of other ways to communicate other then Twitter.

https://youtu.be/FI6dgXSqFzM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading all the tweets between Leo and John, seeing Leo go back and forth from apology to being snide, I'm a bit concerned for his well-being.  I think we all just need to let this go.  I'm quite frustrated with him myself, but I wouldn't want to see anything bad happen.  He's a human being with frailties, just like us all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom Justtom That's a loaded subject Tom. We don't know what kind of harassment and threats Leo has had to deal with over the last 2 years.

 

Maybe I'm naive, but not having John on the show is not to punish John. It's to punish trolls who keep threatening TWIT staff.

 

I'm probably misinterpreting Leo's stance. But I see Leo is giving John a loud message to take responsibility for your fans who are behaving like trolls.

 

Both Adam and John's stance has always been they don't condone any wrongdoing they do.But also that they can't control what they do.

 

I believe Leo is fed up with their stance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The few time I listened to the No Agenda Show, they started the show by criticizing the TWIT show. ?I did like in the No Agenda Show that they try to look beyond the media coverage of news but they was some strange reasoning that I couldn't agree with.

I only listened to the TWIT network for a couple of years and Leo often change is mind and he is the first to recognise it. If you can have on one side people never switch they should be a place for people that like everything like him. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David Pick

 

I know a few things that were publicly mentioned.

 

I believe there were a few chatroom mods that were getting fed up and burned out with the banning of trolls and the like. So they wanted to actually move on. I don't know what those trolls were doing nor what was going on to a T. But that was mentioned by Leo after they took feedback from the viewers and decided to keep the chat going until a solution could be found.

I am not sure why they needed to get a metal detector to screen visitors to the brickhouse but the need for one was also mentioned on air. And I believe at least one bomb threat.

Again I am only going on what I have seen and heard here in the community and on air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It always comes back to "The Trolls". When people engage in criminal acts they are not tolls. They are criminals. Calling them trolls is doing them a favor. Leo said that he believed the criminal acts were done by one person. I kind of doubt only one, but probably a small number. Unfortunately, people are nasty creatures. Always have been and always will be. Technology just makes the situation worse. If you can't take all the nasty feed back you should pull a Boehner and find a new line of work. Sad but true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...