G+_George Kozi Posted August 11, 2016 Share Posted August 11, 2016 Jeff Jarvis As a Professor of Journalism and authoritative voice in your profession, I'd like to hear your take on this.? Originally shared by Nico Martinez A lot of article titles end up being over-exaggerated click bait. This one however is not. How in the world did anyone think it was a good idea to provide enough information to identify closed gay athletes, including ones from homophobic countries? The Daily Beasts reaction to the outrage over this has been to edit out the identifying information from the article. Too little too late and one that also ignores why anyone would care that athletes, gay or not, are having sex, or why the author goes out of his way to be snide about gay athletes. http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2016/08/11/the_daily_beast_s_olympics_grindr_stunt_is_dangerous_and_unethical.html?wpsrc=sh_all_mob_em_top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts