G+_George Kozi Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Originally shared by Andre Speek hehe... ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Nandlal Shah Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Tim Box Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Dwayne Knight (Dark Cyb Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 My understanding is they generally place items not for your convenience but to maximize your exposure so you pick up more things. I wonder if this would be more effective? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Tyler Larson Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Thing is -- they actually do that. That's why salsa is placed next to chips, pasta next to tomato sauce, and so on. In fact, this is the whole point of the loyalty cards: associating purchased items with individuals is only marginally useful; what they really want is the correlation between purchases so that they can organize their store to put items together that you might want. And they've been doing it for decades. Amazon got the idea from supermarkets, not the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Aubrey Green Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Also level placement is paid for by the item provider. That is why name brand items are at eye and hand height and the lower price items are on the floor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts