G+_David Pick Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Jeff Hubert From all evidence, Yes. But let's take the hint from Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ? and leave any further discussion between Leo and John private on this subject. John even expressed to Leo a thank you for an apology from him yesterday. But asked him why he didn't call his phone number? Also, really didn't appreciate Leo making a public spectacle out of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Bruno Haineault Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 David Pick?? I don't disagree but why did they bring this into public forums in the first place? Seems like one or both are trying to win over fans with this public attention. IMHO, this should have been resolved in private. They opened it up to the public so they need to pay the price. I would like to see them resolve this conflict but the acrimonious posts I am seeing pop up doesn't bode too well. I am also wondering if Mike Elgan's days are numbered. Sad... really sad. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Randy Beavers Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 And the World WINS !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Josh Frye Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Bruno Haineault .Everything both do is pretty public, because Facebook, Twitter, instagram, pinterst and all the others are all public. The only way they could have done anything privately is through snail mail. And honestly, 99 percent of this was fans on both sides reading soooo much into this frakus. Heck I didn't read any of the tweets as John being banned read it more like two people who know each other for a long time being smart asses to each other. It sounds like my co workers and I. And dear god can someone show me where Leo was going on on anyone else? That is not just 114 characters. As what you right on Twitter can be read into so bad by anyone it is pathetic. I can read the same tweet two different days in a row and get two different meanings out of it, depending on a persons mood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Kirk Corless Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Amen Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Chris W Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Yes the spat should be private but something productive could come of it. Like talk about the substance of the tweet that started it (Leo L please listen to the NA clip on the clock incident before discussing, it's worth it), why it was appropriate or not to tweet it versus call on the landline, and TwiTs tension between contrarian tech talk (why do we need this new thing, and how do we deal with the Hail Apple market model) vs sponsor concerns. Sponsor concerns are legitimate, what are they and how can they be harmonized without losing the point? Twit does good metatech and John should remain an anchor of that conversation. Leo let him blow his whistle, while you wear a funny hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts