G+_Craig Sotelo Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Belkin creates Chromecast competitor | itiswhatitis.biz, https://tech.itiswhatitis.biz/belkin-creates-chromecast-competitor/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Robert Nugent (DFH) Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 Lee Ball you answered your own question. People without "connected" TVs or media centers can now get that on the cheap. And I'll bet there's a lot of people out there like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Joe Phelps Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 It's not really a competitor. It's one-dimensional, no multi-tasking, mobile only, and too expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Larry Bones Productions Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 I have an Apple TV, and a roku 3 and picked up a chromecast for the fun of it. Honestly I end up using it more than the other two by far most of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Marlon Thompson Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 Larry Bones Productions why is that, I have a chromecast and not the others and a friend of mine who has an apple TV was asking me about getting the Roku of the Chromecast. In your opinion what are the benefits of one over the other apart from cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Luke Olson Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 its all about ease of use. wanna watch a video? one button and its on your tv. No remotes, no awkward typing with arrow keys. DIRT CHEAP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts