G+_marc williamson Posted February 15, 2014 Share Posted February 15, 2014 Originally shared by HeCareth M. Wosu What If.....Google Preempts Apple So We all know that Samsung tried to preempt Apple with their Galaxy Gear watch. We also know how that worked out, at least at the initial release. It is better, but still needs a ton of work. So everyone, and I mean everyone is in fever pitch anticipation for the "iWatch" It is being described as revolutionary, a game changer, innovative, basically the best thing since slice bread...and Apple has not even said they are making one. So here is my theory. What if Google Preemps Apple in the watch Aspect, Here is my logic 1. Google purchased WIMM in like 2012 or so. So watches have been on their mind for a while. I think they have been working to perfect wearables in that X Lab of theirs for a decent period of time, longer than Apple I might add. 2. Google also has Glass. I feel glass is not only an experiment about "Eye Wear" but an experiment about what is the best way to show information at a glance. The API for glass was also renamed to from "Glass" to "Mirror" API and I think this is because this same API will be used in all wearables 3. Google is a data driven company. Wearables are all about having the right data/information at the right time. It is what we are missing in a watch. Not just notifications, or health information, but the right notification at the right time Google has showed us that with Google Now, they understand this, and as a company driven on data they are steps ahead of what any other company is doing. The rumors. Now we all know a rumor came out at the end of last year that Google was in production of a smart watch. Then poof nothing happened. This was right around November. I think Google saw what they had and was like the hardware is not up to snuff we can do better. So they were like.... 1. Divest Motorola as Google already has the Patents anyway, and Motorola is killing the bottom line. This will open up some space for a major non Mobile hardware acquisition. But who.... 2. Nest. They are really about merging in predictive data to hardware which fits right into what we Google is trying to do with Wearable and Home Automation. Plus they have a good hardware aesthetic Google could use internally for all hardware. Google started talking to Lenovo right around the time the Google watch Rumors hit. I do not think this was a coincidence, and I would say they were talking to Nest around the same time. I think Google has the software ready and it has been ready, but the hardware is not. I feel Google sent what they had to the Nest team, and they will edit and produce a version 2 that will be introduced at Google I/O. Before Apple has a chance to present their own. Here is what I expect: 1. The Defining Feature will be Contextual Notifications through Google Now 2. Google will most likely sell this thing for $99 to $150. As it will be an ecosystem market play, rather than a hardware sales play. I think Google will offer bright plastic colors similar to the Nexus 7 for $99 with metal options for $150 and up. 3. The Apps currently available on Glass will be easily ported to the Watch with Google providing API access to Google Now. This will give Google a big head start with developers already using Glass API 4. I believe it will be WiFi enabled and able to work independently on your WiFi network, for contextual Google Now notifications 5. It will also use Bluetooth LE for connecting to your phone for Phone related notifications 6. It will track heart rate, steps, and other vital information. Giving you daily summarizes of your activity in a card similar to the monthly steps card. I just think, as people focus so closely on what Apple is doing...so much of the writing is on the wall with what Google is doing. Photo Credit: Adrian Maciburko, "Google Time Concept" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Joshua Masterson Posted February 15, 2014 Share Posted February 15, 2014 It certainly seems like we are witnessing a chess game in which Google is playing seven moves ahead of the competition. Glass itself has been a well managed project with the exception of the public's irrational fixation over the camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_HeCareth M. Wosu Posted February 15, 2014 Share Posted February 15, 2014 Joshua Masterson You are right. I think the Tech press is so focused in on Apple they are completely missing what is right in front of them. Mike Elgan did a nice write up on his thoughts last September here: http://www.cultofandroid.com/40810/googles-smartwatch-wont-be-a-smartwatch/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Matt Wells Posted February 15, 2014 Share Posted February 15, 2014 They could use MC Hammer's phrase to promote it. "Stop..... google time, can't touch this..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G+_Kent Smith Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I think the hardware and the price point are the only two variables that they need to figure out. As a few people have pointed out Google Now on your watch would certainly be something I pay for (assuming the price is in the range you stated) but I absolutely love the point that Gina Trapani has mentioned a few times which is the rich notifications of Android. If you have the ability to pass an audio track or archive an email or other such things that it would give an entire new feature set to the watch without much additional cost / features needed. If Google can add in the ability to use Google Voice Actions through the watch than that could be another nice feature. But I honestly find it hard to believe this could be done well and give much added value beyond what I have with my Moto X right now. BUT.... perhaps it could give that "always" listening feature to people that don't have that feature in their phones currently. The WiFi capability is interesting, but would that just cause additional battery drain? Wouldn't just BT be adequate for what you are pushing for data back and forth and the internet connection be through your phone? I guess if the WiFi can be shut off and doesn't add a significant size / cost penalty ok, but I think cost is going to be a major factor for this thing. Second to that will be battery life and having an additional radio is likely going to hurt those things. But perhaps some of those designers can pull a rabbit out of their bag here. Definitely an interesting space right now. I'm very interested to see what becomes of Glass and what happens in the watch space. It seems the latest "leaks" and rumors around the iWatch have it changing into more of a health and fitness device. I can't see Apple releasing that without something beyond what Fitbit and Nike and those others have already done. But they don't have the infrastructure to do the full bore Google Now thing which is what I really want. And as somebody who has only recently touched iOS again (company mandated device) I would not pay anything for an iOS notification feature. They have a long way to go to catch up to Android in that space still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts